Monday, October 16, 2006

out of the bag

6 comments:

elnellis said...

this has got to be 'shopped. is it?

Anonymous said...

i'm totally anti photoshop on this site. so actually no, i read a whole thing about it, it's the real dizeal.

elnellis said...

i want proof, cause it looks shaddy!

Anonymous said...

dude phil. your sleth skills are formidible. i was duped it seems. i read an acticle a while back that can be found here.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/animals/bigcat.asp

after the block quotes follows and explanation debunking this urban legend that apparently ensnared many people, yours truly included. the location was the chalk river in ontario. the inside joke is that the chalk river was the site of a major nuclear power plant. i'm not sure how you were able to see that errors on the photo, cuz i still can't tell for sure. in any case i owe you a brewski. i'll make good on that soon.

Anonymous said...

ok now i see. there's alot of blur around the cat, especially the tail. the dude's hand looks totally bogus as well as the general focus of the kitty.

elnellis said...

the real thing that gave it away for me was that the cat's back isn't sagging under it's weight. an animal that big would have a bow in the back... unless of course it's been taxidermed. that's what it looks like with the good posture, large and full of styrophome. but i see the dude's feathered hand now too.
look fwd to that brewski